CO129-486 - Public Offices - 1924 — Page 353

216

(*)

+ QU

boo

(e)

t

* Tano kan det?h

ly the Chinese authorities.

350

To g Jerred

13 LAMANDRE (Aldos fora delibet mid að bræ DEY

ahi cá bært

1

nui terabience omni sanu bid to font

.

bar be ben I SL Com Tasaang and at the?"

1

Jarner Wað ei best e ̧** ** HOT? «OJÍAM SHÍ no do....

+

ja 9Jalusmeð «*****£** era to agrasto ni qaiX TW beban 32

TRATA DIA 94

C

And betrager ?%%!% T¥ dofoqseb >= AI

It would mundar that in this, as in other similar

the only Journe to follow in te admit a direct conflict

of British and Chinese Law in regard to nationaláty wnɑ

ON T

consequent inability to protect sugn individuals in China

against the Chinese authorities, and, having lodged a formal

protest with the latter, to so infarm the permans cono e med,

who would have to face the fact that, whatever our viewn an

to their national status under Fritish law may be, we are

unable to force centance of those Vi 417

on the Chinese

Gathorities in the event of a confilot of nationality law,

- bad (be Josqro ad a‡

• ** GARY

tai ai Tử. Sapa)

and that if they

choose to visit or reside in China,

they must

bu prepared to accept the situation arising from their double

nationality mi submit to Chinese jurisdiction when outside

beargə bas midi Jente e sobreborg have the bra #ostdure dellinf

the limite of the exterritorialised areas unčar foreign cont rol

and að grimin to grow Tatum) vot enit a

Sədə kring

od r

quot an attitude on our part would at least render the mitus-

Swaggal maisomtystam feung 219 Minubong audi ; Josidus duktig?

tion of the individuals coneemed no worse, while it would

ana eni antflureT

result

in Wie Majesty'

Consular offtoers sekning to have to

HINO NË 12001 for det‡ËTË Pa tostare at savimi. **

undertake the thankless and humilisting task of reiterating

@laim and demands which the know will be ruswarily rajreted

by the Chinese authorities in connection with the nati anal